Revealed: Moe's thoughts on performing well - LynnBlakeGolf Forums

Revealed: Moe's thoughts on performing well

Mind over Muscle – The Mental Approach

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-23-2010, 09:58 PM
innercityteacher's Avatar
innercityteacher innercityteacher is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,900
When we keep our hands level and on plane...
Are we vindicating Moe Norman albiet in a more informed way?
I just cannot get over how cool of a golfer he was.

Do you ever think, OB or anyone, we will ever see a golfer do better than Tiger or Byron Nelson or Moe in terms of winning so many tournaments in a row or just so many?

If I can progress so much with TGM given my limiations, couldn't one of our students or kids just go off on the universe? Mad skills and mad fact-based instruction = crazy great schievement!

Patrick



Originally Posted by O.B.Left View Post
Although most of his thoughts relate to his mental approach, perhaps due to his tremendous insecurity, its interesting to note that his first bullet relates to what we would term extensor action.

There are many other TGM like thoughts to my eye.

And "swing arms up as body turns away" reminds me of the MacDonald drill.

O.B.

http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/a...d=122823405 5
__________________
HP, grant me the serenity to accept what I cannot change, the courage to change what I can, and the wisdom to know the difference. Progress and not perfection is the goal every day!

Last edited by innercityteacher : 03-23-2010 at 10:00 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-23-2010, 10:46 PM
O.B.Left O.B.Left is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,433
Originally Posted by innercityteacher View Post
Are we vindicating Moe Norman albiet in a more informed way?
I just cannot get over how cool of a golfer he was.

Do you ever think, OB or anyone, we will ever see a golfer do better than Tiger or Byron Nelson or Moe in terms of winning so many tournaments in a row or just so many?

If I can progress so much with TGM given my limiations, couldn't one of our students or kids just go off on the universe? Mad skills and mad fact-based instruction = crazy great schievement!

Patrick

Im glad things are working so well for you Patrick. Thats great.

When I was a kid they said there'd never be another Bobby Orr, now its like "who was Bobby Orr". Me, I remember him well. Went to his hockey school. The bar keeps getting raised, not by us but by the Bobby Orrs and Tiger Woods of the world. They attract better young athletes to their respective games too. Everything is possible I suppose but Mr Nelson's 11 victories in a row.......that will be a tough one to surpass given how deep the fields are these days.

Id say Byron Nelson was a golfing machine! Wouldnt be too hard to catalogue his complementary component variations I dont think. Lagging Takeaway , Double Anchor , Top, Drag Loading or whatever. Homer Kelley new his motion very well, Id imagine. His components and their respective relationships, like Misters Hogan, Snead and others were formative in Homers process of identification. Their swing DNA, their "Machinations" if you will live on today in the Golfing Machines text. I cant separate Drag Loading and 6-M-1 from Hogan for instance. Especially after I heard that Homer had in this regard remarked something to the effect of : "Now, Hogan ........ the ideal........".

Homer didnt invent this stuff, he just identified it. Master golfers have been Golfing Machine like, for ever. The system is based on universal laws of geometry and physics after all. Alignments, Relationships. Like a wall ideally stands at 90 degrees to the floor so does the RFFW to the LAFW etc etc etc.

Below is Jim Barnes, turn of the century golf champion. Nice alignments , eh? "Who was Jim Barnes ?" You, ask. Ah your great grand dad would smack you, and say "There'll never be another one like him, lad"

By the way I wouldnt be surprised if Homer had Jim Barnes' book too. This illustration , circa 1926, is in a section entitled "Follow Through". Disregard his covering of the plane line seen here, it would take until 1969 before someone would decipher the correct geometry of that bit of business. It took Homer 15 years to discover that he needed to stop reading the text and just look at the pictures.


http://www.lynnblakegolf.com/forum/a...d=126943957 6
Attached Thumbnails:
Click image for larger version

Name:	Picture 88.png
Views:	259
Size:	537.2 KB
ID:	2294  

Last edited by O.B.Left : 03-24-2010 at 10:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-24-2010, 10:23 AM
Sean1's Avatar
Sean1 Sean1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Somewhere in the Multiverse...
Posts: 65
Thanks for sharing, OB. I wonder how much of fear has to do with "bad" golf? It's almost as if everything else is a subset of fear and that if we can master fear we can "master" golf.

However, could fear be seen as a subset of something else? A poor self image? Wanting approval? Etc.? Why do many of us view a poor shot as a reflection on us as a person instead of just a golf shot?

Golf just IS.

Is it what we bring to golf that makes it good, bad, or indifferent?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:03 AM.


Design by Vjacheslav Trushkin, color scheme by ColorizeIt!.